Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Barack Obama Announces National Security Team; Hillary Clinton, Robert Gates, Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Susan Rice, Jim Jones



Barack Obama Press Conference
National Security Team Announcement
Chicago Hilton | December 1, 2008


Hillary Clinton - Secretary of State
Robert Gates - Secretary of Defense
Janet Napolitano - Homeland Security
Eric Holder - Attorney General
Susan Rice - U.N. Ambassador
Jim Jones - National Security Advisor

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Where is Janet Reno?

Anonymous said...

The future of America

More on Barack Obama's S.2433 : Global Poverty Act

We know for a fact that this bill will cost America $845 billion above and beyond what America already spends on global aid in the next thirteen years. America will be locked in to giving .7 percent of the U.S. gross national product. That in itself is scary enough, but there is way more to Obama's bill. It also locks us into United Nations Millennium Summit. Cliff Kincaid from Accuracy in Media is all over this bill. He writes

The bill institutes the United Nations Millennium Summit goals as the benchmarks for U.S. spending.

"It is time the United States makes it a priority of our foreign policy to meet this goal and help those who are struggling day to day," a statement issued by supporters, including Obama, said.

Specifically, it would "declare" that the official U.S. policy is to eliminate global poverty, that the president is "required" to "develop and implement" a strategy to reach that goal and requires that the U.S. efforts be "specific and measurable."

Kincaid said that after cutting through all of the honorable-sounding goals in the plan, the bottom line is that the legislation would mandate the 0.7 percent of the U.S. GNP as "official development assistance."

"In addition to seeking to eradicate poverty, that (U.N.) declaration commits nations to banning 'small arms and light weapons' and ratifying a series of treaties, including the International Criminal Court Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol (global warming treaty), the Convention of Biological Diversity, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Convention of the Rights of the Child," he said.

Those U.N. protocols would make U.S. law on issues ranging from the 2nd Amendment to energy usage and parental rights all subservient to United Nations whims.

Kincaid also reported Jeffrey Sachs, who runs the "Millennium Project," confirms a U.N. plan to force the U.S. to pay 0.7 percent of GNP would add about $65 billion a year to what the U.S. already donates overseas.

And the only way to raise that funding, Sachs confirms, "is through a global tax, preferably on carbon-emitting fossil fuels," Kincaid writes.

On the forum run by Americans for Legal Immigration PAC, one writer reported estimates of taxes from 35 cents to $1 dollar a gallon on gasoline would be needed.(LINK)

This ladies and gentleman is the Barack Obama vision for America . WND called Obama's office and the others who support this bill....No comment.

Leonard said...

“The Quiet War was quietly declared by the International Elite at a meeting held in 1954.” Note: the first Bilderberg Conference was held in 1954 in the Netherlands.

“In 1954 . . . in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent.”

“Consequently, in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few.”

The above is quoted from, “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars” An Introduction Programming Manual Operations Research Technical Manual - TW-SW7905.1

Where do you think the leaders of the Corporation called the United States are at on this? Do you think they will support the general population or will they assure their own place in that elite?

Is there any doubt as to the answer?

Will the new administration be any different?

Leonard said...

From the same document referenced above. I love this one.

"When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property without just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for surrender and is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who pay income tax despite an obvious lack of reciprocal or honest service from the government."

Are the people of America ripe for the picking i.e. enslavement to the elite mentioned in the comment written above this one?

Ask yourself if we receive reciprocal and honest service from government.